The $400 Million Iran Payment, Explained For Suburban Voters
After a long and productive Facebook conversation, I think I have a good way of explaining this whole Iran/Nuclear Deal/$400 Million Payment thing in a way suburban voters can appreciate.
Non-Sequiturs: 08.27.15
* Folks may argue over whether the Iran deal is a good idea, but one "citizen-lawyer" has taken to court to prove it is unconstitutional... but does that argument hold any weight? [Constitution Center] * An Arkansas law firm is offering to represent Anna Duggar -- pro bono -- should she ever decide to divorce her husband, Josh Duggar, after his very public cheating scandal. Which is good, since you know Jim Bob is never going to let Anna see any of that rapidly vanishing TV money. [THV11] * What are the 5 best Halloween costumes for law students/lawyers? The real key to nailing number 5 is the bangs. [Law and More] * At last, some cold hard evidence that the nation's fever dream -- the one where Donald Trump is the frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination -- might be ending. [New York Times] * How do you deal when you're assigned to work with a real prick who always has to be right? [Attorney at Work] * You guys, the intellectual property regime in this country is definitely broken, but at least it isn't so bad that a man can copyright a chicken sandwich. [Washington Post] * In unsurprising news, George Zimmerman had some pretty disgusting things to say about the deaths of Alison Parker and Adam Ward. [Salon]
Labor and Employment Federal Litigation Trends 2026
Drawing on more than a decade of data, the report equips law firms and corporate legal teams with actionable insights to better assess risk, refine strategy, and anticipate outcomes in today’s evolving workplace disputes.